Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader: Cleated or Felt Outsole – Is It Worth the Money?
For fishing enthusiasts, having the right gear is essential for comfort, safety, and success on the water. One crucial piece of equipment for anglers who wade in rivers, lakes, or streams is a reliable pair of hip waders. The Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader is a popular choice among budget-conscious anglers, offering both cleated and felt outsole options. But how does it perform in terms of durability, comfort, and overall value? Let’s take a closer look.
1. Build Quality and Durability
The Kylebooker Rana II is constructed from PVC material, which is known for its waterproof properties and resistance to abrasion. Unlike neoprene waders, PVC waders are generally more affordable but may lack the same level of flexibility and insulation. However, for warm-weather fishing or shallow wading, PVC is a practical choice.
The bootfoot design means the boots are permanently attached to the waders, eliminating the need for separate wading shoes. This can be convenient but may also limit adjustability. The seams are reinforced to prevent leaks, though some users report that long-term durability can be an issue if not properly maintained.
2. Comfort and Fit
One of the standout features of the Rana II is its adjustable suspenders, which help distribute weight evenly and reduce strain on the shoulders. The waders come in various sizes, ensuring a snug fit for most anglers. However, since PVC is less breathable than neoprene, they may feel hot during extended use in warm conditions.
The bootfoot design provides decent ankle support, but some users find the sizing slightly off—either too tight or too loose. Trying them on before purchase (if possible) is advisable.
3. Cleated vs. Felt Outsole: Which Is Better?
The Rana II comes in two sole options:
– Cleated Outsole: Ideal for rocky or slippery surfaces, the cleats provide excellent traction on uneven terrain. However, they can be noisy and may damage boat floors.
– Felt Outsole: Perfect for slick riverbeds, felt soles offer superior grip on algae-covered rocks. However, they wear out faster on rough surfaces and are banned in some regions due to invasive species concerns.
Your choice depends on your fishing environment. If you frequently wade in fast-moving rivers with slippery rocks, felt soles are the better option. For mixed terrain, cleated soles offer more versatility.
4. Price and Value
Compared to high-end brands like Simms or Hodgman, the Kylebooker Rana II is significantly more affordable, making it an attractive option for beginners or casual anglers. While it may not last as long as premium waders, its reasonable price point makes it a good entry-level choice.
5. Pros and Cons Summary
Pros:
✔ Affordable compared to premium brands
✔ Waterproof PVC construction
✔ Adjustable suspenders for better comfort
✔ Available in cleated and felt sole options
✔ Good for warm-weather fishing
Cons:
✘ Less breathable than neoprene waders
✘ Durability may be an issue with heavy use
✘ Boot sizing can be inconsistent
Final Verdict: Is It Worth Buying?
If you’re looking for a budget-friendly pair of hip waders for occasional fishing trips, the Kylebooker Rana II PVC Bootfoot Hip Wader is a solid choice. While it may not match the longevity of high-end models, its affordability, waterproof design, and traction options make it a practical purchase for casual anglers.
For serious wading anglers who fish frequently in harsh conditions, investing in a more durable pair might be worthwhile. But for those who need a cost-effective, functional wader, the Rana II delivers decent performance at a fraction of the price.
Would you choose the cleated or felt sole version? Let us know in the comments! Happy fishing! 🎣